<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>LexBlog</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.lexblog.com</provider_url><author_name>Greg Lambert</author_name><author_url>https://www.lexblog.com/author/greglambert/</author_url><title>Legal AI Under the Microscope: Stanford HAI's In-Depth Analysis of Lexis and Westlaw AI Tools - LexBlog</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="5OSeKMYxSN"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.lexblog.com/2024/05/31/legal-ai-under-the-microscope-stanford-hais-in-depth-analysis-of-lexis-and-westlaw-ai-tools/"&gt;Legal AI Under the Microscope: Stanford HAI&#x2019;s In-Depth Analysis of Lexis and Westlaw AI Tools&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.lexblog.com/2024/05/31/legal-ai-under-the-microscope-stanford-hais-in-depth-analysis-of-lexis-and-westlaw-ai-tools/embed/#?secret=5OSeKMYxSN" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Legal AI Under the Microscope: Stanford HAI&#x2019;s In-Depth Analysis of Lexis and Westlaw AI Tools&#x201D; &#x2014; LexBlog" data-secret="5OSeKMYxSN" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>http://www.lexblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/StanfordStudy.png</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1191</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>667</thumbnail_height><description>Reflections on the Stanford HAI Report on Legal AI Research Tools The updated paper from the Stanford HAI team presents rigorous and insightful research into the performance of generative AI tools for legal research. The complexity of legal research is well-acknowledged, and this study looks into the capabilities and limitations of AI-driven legal research tools [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
